Session on Wednesday, 25 December 2024,
Headed by Judge Mohammed Abdulrahman Al-Jarrah, ‘Head of the Department’,
With the membership of Judges Dr Hassan Mohammed Hassan Hind and Khaled Mustafa Hassan
(1-2) The court ‘subject matter court: Must take note of all elements of the case and respond to the substantive claims and defences’.
1. Analysis and familiarisation with all elements of the case, examining the evidence and responding to the substantive claims and defences. The trial court must not violate this. Invalid deficiency.
2. The appellant's insistence that she wrote to the appellant several times to urge him to return to work and implement the judgements issued in his favour, as evidenced by documents, and the appellant's failure to deny this. Substantial defence.
The dismissal of the appealed verdict on the grounds that if the administration's claim that it asked him to take over the work by correspondence was true, the appellant would not have needed to raise these issues is a violation of the right of defence and a violation of the law that requires cassation.